SEARCH
5.0 GNW Treasure Minato
Reply
  • Go To
  • Page
Views: 2166 ｜ Replies: 8
[ Suggestions ] Cross Server for GNW?

 [

Copy Link

]

vr00z
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 18
  • Posts: 336
On 2017-07-13 12:43:42 ｜ Show this Author Only ｜ Descending Order
1＃ Go To
It's a good idea !!
Reply
NobodyReally
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 21
  • Posts: 259
On 2017-07-13 13:01:58 ｜ Show this Author Only
2＃
NO this would make the already terrible groups that struggle to get to the finals to get the packs for their group have a harder tim, so in sort no it would be unfair for under developed groups This post was last edited by The SageArtist at 2017-7-13 13:03
Reply
Airth
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 27
  • Posts: 52
On 2017-07-13 13:10:35 ｜ Show this Author Only
3＃
ya it would kill off alot of groups and alot of people wouldnt beable to get to the finals
Reply
Broken Screen
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 44
  • Posts: 1571
On 2017-07-13 14:14:39 ｜ Show this Author Only
4＃
Biggest NOPETOWN.com

My (merged) server, smaller groups are already struggling to fight my group as they are.
If x-server happens, weaker groups have to join stronger group for the chance that they may not know, that new leader would give packs to them or not.

10 Packs for that many players in a group will create more conflict. I've already seen it, not my group though.

In the future this will create less group that will also affect convoy and plunder to be more imbalance. Players will want to quit even more because they don't improve their team fast enough against strong group(s) nor have enough sealed scrolls to get ninja they wish to have.
Reply
Amaru_S199
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 1
  • Posts: 38
On 2017-07-13 15:04:29 ｜ Show this Author Only
5＃
No offense, but its a really really really bad idea.
Immediate effects: less rewards overall.
Older/stronger groups monopolize rewards but can't benefit much from it. To be competitive in something so big, you probably need at least 27 top tier players active, but again..only 9-10 packs to share. As with cross server sage, dont expect any improvements in reward structure.

Eventual effects: Small and moderate groups die > Players go to the only remaining groups in their server > rewards again shared by a much larger pool of people > Death of GNW for certain servers who are already dying.

Yeah i basically echo what everyone above is saying. Another question would be.. What does X-server GNW bring? It doesn't add anything for gameplay and actually removes one of the only things left which isn't cross server. Everything that became cross server, i've stopped playing because its a waste of time. If playing in big scale highly competitive GNW is something you wanted, make a new account in servers which have those.
Reply
NobodyReally
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 21
  • Posts: 259
On 2017-07-13 15:14:26 ｜ Show this Author Only
6＃
yeah this is just a bad idea on the whole to be honest, what would be the benefit of them doing this?

Feel like this thread i just a feeder for your forums exp it has no detail as to why you would want them to do something like this.
Reply
CensorIsReal
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 21
  • Posts: 338
On 2017-07-13 15:15:54 ｜ Show this Author Only
7＃
Note: This post has been filtered by Daiske (Administrator)
Reply
Zelgadis~
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 49
  • Posts: 1169
On 2017-07-13 15:24:06 ｜ Show this Author Only
8＃
This would be the worst possible idea ever shown in this forum.
Seriously, a cross server gnw would mix together both the bad sides of cross server matsuri and cross server sage world battlefield.
Since they can't modify any minimum thing regarding the scripting side of the game the result would be *ways 3 rounds gnw on saturday whose only result in comparison with now would be to reduce the number of good gnw packs delivered. This would induce people in joining the strongest group of the server with the marvelous result that you would have more people among which the high tier rewards would be divided among and also less people to plunder since you can't plunder people in your group.
To do something like that you would need a massive revolution of how group activities work and an as big revolution as the other one about rewards for gnw.
So no, really, no, and please don't put in their head such horrible ideas, because they could become true.
Reply
Reply
  • Go To
  • Page
Quicky Post
Bold
Underline
Italic
Strikethrough
Clear Format
Text Color
Background
Font
Size
Align Left
Center
Align Right
Link
Delete Link
Emoticon
Image
Video
Undo
Redo


Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register

You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
Report
Enter the Reason of the Report:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.

Confirm Delete Selected Topics？

Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.

Confirm Delete The post you selected？

Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
Ban (for this Section)

Status:

Ban Type:
Ban for a Period:
  • Hour(s)
  • Day(s)
  • Month(s)
  • Ban Permanently
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!