Reply
Views: 1538 | Replies: 4
[ Suggestions ] Sage World Battlefields

 [

Copy Link

]

  • Registered: 2018-12-27
  • Topics: 3
  • Posts: 3
On 2019-05-28 20:37:39Show this Author OnlyDescending Order
1# Go To

I'm a F2P and i really want to suggest this. I think it's rational and logical to base the matchmaking of sage for power level of the player rather than it's level. Well hello, we all knew that this game is not for F2P but specifically for P2W players it is an open secret. I hope you guys still cares about us poor players maybe, just maybe adjust the matchmaking of sage world battlefields.

P.S
I really love this game.

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 31
  • Posts: 87
On 2019-05-30 00:47:44Show this Author Only
2#

Haha. I was just in another thread writing about the ridiculous matching in another mode. Regarding Sage, at a certain point (cross ;) ) the game stops being a competitive game and turns into a feast for the grossly OP players. Some modes, intentional or not, are designed to keep a mass amount of people from progressing. Keeping the player stagnant and unable to advance in a reasonable amount of time. If you aren't among the top players in sage it will take you several months to get the advance runes required to max on a single equipment. The game becomes even more tedious because of it.


Those people who are OP should fight each other or have their own sage. Maybe extend cross to more clusters so enough people will be in the sage. The moderately powered people can have their own sage and the casual player or lowly powered can have their own sage. This would introduce more competitiveness in sage; maybe even drive more people to spend because the competition is there. If you read this and have the power to influence this, pass the posts on will you?

  • Registered: 2018-02-02
  • Topics: 32
  • Posts: 2137
On 2019-05-30 19:48:24Show this Author Only
3#

I suggested in the past to remove advanced refinements as rewards for top 3 placements in swb to replace them with ability scrolls, advanced threads, myoboku gifts or nature scrolls.

This is currently the only way to make that feature decent.

  • Registered: 2018-12-27
  • Topics: 3
  • Posts: 3
On 2019-06-02 23:50:50Show this Author Only
4#
  • firestarter On 2019-05-30 00:47:44
  • Haha. I was just in another thread writing about the ridiculous matching in another mode. Regarding Sage, at a certain point (cross ;) ) the game stops being a competitive game and turns into a feast for the grossly OP players. Some modes, intentional or not, are designed to keep a mass amount of people from progressing. Keeping the player stagnant and unable to advance in a reasonable amount of time. If you aren't among the top players in sage it will take you several months to get the advance runes required to max on a single equipment. The game becomes even more tedious because of it.


    Those people who are OP should fight each other or have their own sage. Maybe extend cross to more clusters so enough people will be in the sage. The moderately powered people can have their own sage and the casual player or lowly powered can have their own sage. This would introduce more competitiveness in sage; maybe even drive more people to spend because the competition is there. If you read this and have the power to influence this, pass the posts on will you?

but who are we? we're just a f2p players and we all know that oasis doesn't give a fuuck on us. I created this thread hoping that they might read it and give some time and consider it, but it's more like:

f2p: can you make your game a little f2p friendly by making your game a little fairer to f2p?

oasis: what do you mean?

f2p: can you adjust the matchmaking in some game activities/events? for example sage.

oasis: how?

f2p: in matchmaking instead of level, base it by power, 'coz some p2w players are way too op and they just eat us during the event.

oasis: lmao that's the point, if they feel they are superior they'll give us more money. Life's not fair son only rich can complain.




This post was last edited by xzxzxzxzx on 2019-06-02 23:51:21.
Reply
Quicky Post
Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register