You werent here when the xserver sage poll was in action, were you? You can go and take a look at that poll, plenty of potential problems were brought up against xserver for sage.

I like the random clothing solution solution, but let's try one better: how about a random re-spawning point?

Ah good, i see you remember that 2nd post. Save me the time (trying to) paraphrase it. Pretty funny too because it was that 2nd post that pushed me to voted no.

The problem was that the system classifies the players by their lvs first, then bp, instead of taking both player's lvs and bp into consideration at the same time; or establishing a reasonable cap to lessen the power gap. And we have already known from playing the game, lv doesn't mean that much when it come to pvp. There are plenty of examples about how ppl purposely postpone lving up their characters to better benefit them in Matsuri/Sage. Staying in one server means you could at least keep an eye on these guys and prepare yourself if you run into them.

Also, was there a point when ppl really feel comfortable or satisfied with the matchmaking system in the game? The programming might be different amongst arena, matsuri and sage - and this has been stressed in so many posts, yet plenty of ppl still don't trust the matching system and voted no. Heck, people know that this is unavoidable and they still vote no. Shouldn't that tell you about how people feel toward the matchmaking system?

The rest of the problem like the amount of adv threads dished out, lag, queing time, the very forseeable and unavoidable bugs, etc. are neglegible, really. This post was last edited by Watanuki13 at 2017-5-13 19:35

OK, first of all, cut the passive-aggressive bulls if you want to have a respectful conversation with ppl, which is something I thought we were doing until i read your last reply O.o. You asked and i answered, because I honestly thought you weren't awared of the thread. If you got off from baiting ppl, go for * - it's healthier for the both of us. (Also, pardon me for taking so much time compose such a so-so reply. I guess sometimes you forget that this is an international game/forum and not everybody speaks English as their native language. But if that wasn't a dig about my English proficency then please feel free to ignore this part.)

As for 2nd, I think you understand it quite well. OG won't be nerfing paying players so much - afterall, they pay to have the edge. I suppose I could have phrased it differently; what I meant was grouping ppl with similar lv but withing a certain power cap; for example all lv 90 with BP between 60 to 70k, then move to the next cluster, and so on. Also, you are that sure that you could speak for all servers?

Erm, no. Actually ppl know since pre-Aris. Unless those ppl don't follow Scion or don't dig around the Chinese forum. Or play the Taiwan version on Facebook.

As for your last 2 points, please go back and re-read what I said. I said it was neglegible, meaning they are non-issue.

Dude, I mean no disrespect to you in anyway, so cool you jet, go back and re-read what I said. Some stuffs you said make me feel like you just skimmed through a few words and got pissed.

Phew, I really had to take a walk after that. I guess I took some of the things you said in the worst way possible when you were probably trying to lighten the post up and I apologize for that. It's tough to read the meaning behind writings without verbal cues.

I think we are clear with each other on our opinion about the matchmaking system. I remember Tobei said something about the admin team had forwarded the our suggestions on matchmaking many times, but since nothing's changed I guess it's out of their hands.

As for people knew about it in advanced of the poll, i wasn't really one of them. I only supected it from snooping around the CN forum, but of course that was done with GG translate so :P. But somebody playing the CN version confirmed it in the poll thread thou.

@ser: There are things that could be read in two ways, bro. I took the worst way.
Hopefully they at least consider randomising respawning point as an option.
This post was last edited by Watanuki13 at 2017-5-13 23:49