Reply
Views: 3427 | Replies: 7
[ Suggestions ] Sage World Battlefields

 [

Copy Link

]

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 6
  • Posts: 70
On 2017-01-06 20:52:08Show this Author OnlyDescending Order
1# Go To
So, since 2.0 the sage world battle field was divided into 2 groups.

Atm on server 95 there is mabye 20 people that can join the 81 and over sage, and thats if all of them come.
We had less than 8 people in each field and was only able to get 4 fight off due to zero people.

Is there anyway to change it back to normal sage intill servers start to get more higher levels?

Also just to inform you, this is a merge of 3 servers.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 131
On 2017-01-06 21:07:55Show this Author Only
2#
when people quit you will be combined in 1 sage field. Until then you fight like that.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 34
  • Posts: 4320
On 2017-01-07 00:54:25Show this Author Only
3#
Hey


It's based on activity, if the Sage Battlefield is vastly active, it can be divided based on level.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 0
  • Posts: 17
On 2017-01-07 00:59:56Show this Author Only
4#
  • Tobei On 2017-01-07 00:54:25
  • Hey


    It's based on activity, if the Sage Battlefield is vastly active, it can be divided based on level.
I had no idea that why just merged 3 dead servers? It was certainly dead like before. After merge, 3 dead servers only have 40 ppl in sage world battlefields. Where is the competitiveness? Copy all the stuffs from CN version, why not learn the methods which they deal with the servers merged?
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 29
  • Posts: 2271
On 2017-01-07 01:53:08Show this Author Only
5#
  • Tobei On 2017-01-07 00:54:25
  • Hey


    It's based on activity, if the Sage Battlefield is vastly active, it can be divided based on level.
it sounds that the server might be sufficiently active overall, since it did divide, but the divisor is put in the wrong spot, since the top bracket is, based on what he said, sparsely populated.
I do believe it's based on registration count, so the only reason I see this happening is that the "check" is still being done by divisor at 70 but the actual division happened at 81.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 4
  • Posts: 89
On 2017-01-09 12:45:22Show this Author Only
6#
  • PraiseLuka On 2017-01-07 01:53:08
  • it sounds that the server might be sufficiently active overall, since it did divide, but the divisor is put in the wrong spot, since the top bracket is, based on what he said, sparsely populated.
    I do believe it's based on registration count, so the only reason I see this happening is that the "check" is still being done by divisor at 70 but the actual division happened at 81.
IMHO there is no such thing as divisor based on lvl. It takes first 75 people based on exp and puts them in 1 field, rest people are put into second fielda and thats why it may end with such low 3*9 teams. Again if there is not enough people for the second field(i think about 100 total) it puts all into 1 field resulting in >30 person in each team.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 29
  • Posts: 2271
On 2017-01-09 12:47:35Show this Author Only
7#
  • JackyChan On 2017-01-09 12:45:22
  • IMHO there is no such thing as divisor based on lvl. It takes first 75 people based on exp and puts them in 1 field, rest people are put into second fielda and thats why it may end with such low 3*9 teams. Again if there is not enough people for the second field(i think about 100 total) it puts all into 1 field resulting in >30 person in each team.
And that makes the divisor better how? The point is that divisor should be in the middle rather than skewed in any way or form.
Reply
Quicky Post
Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register