LOGIN
Register
Reply
-
-
- Registered: 2017-07-24
- Topics: 11
- Posts: 45
- Yuusuke On 2016-11-24 09:14:50
-
And why should we prioritise servers who are much better off than other servers?
If there is a wide-spread problem, the most logical decision is to first solve it where the problem hits hardest.
Everyone wants the merge, obviously, but there's only so much there can be done at a time.
But why take 2 dead servers and mash them together? ... why not merge 2 mid servers , throw the really dying ones in with the merge as well... EVERYONE IS HAPPY... HAPPY PEOPLE SPEND MONEY...JS. If u can merge 2 , then you should be able to merge 4. -
-
-
- Registered: 2017-07-24
- Topics: 11
- Posts: 45
- nh111 On 2016-11-24 10:15:22
- That is simple, if there was a problem then they would have less problems on their hands. It is like testing on mice. Any responsible person doesn't rush to human testing.
I understand the first 2 were guinea pigs .. but from here on out ( now that they know how to do it and what to expect) they can make everyone happy just doing the way i described. again .. just a thought -
-
-
- Registered: 2017-07-24
- Topics: 11
- Posts: 45
-
-
-
- Registered: 2017-07-24
- Topics: 11
- Posts: 45
- Daiske On 2016-11-28 05:25:26
-
Please calm down everyone. This merge was just test. We wanted to make sure everything will be okay when we will start merging servers. During this test, we've noticed few problems and our team needs to fix them first and then we can start merging other servers again.
There is no need to mention all servers that are inactive.
Thank you .. that is all we wanted... we just needed an update :) This post was last edited by WyldChild18 at 2016-11-28 05:54 -
Reply
Quicky Post
Reply
Log in in order to Post. LOGIN | Register