From what you have explained: if, theoretically myself and opponent have same rows, but let's say for example, that my move 1 has higher init than his move 1, and his move 2 has higher init than my move 2, and my move 3 has higher init than his move 3, and his move 4 has higher init than my move 4;
then you say that move order is: My Nin - His Nin, His Nin - My Nin, My Nin - His Nin, His Nin - My Nin ???
I don't think I have ever seen an example when My Nin attacked one after the other, so I don't think what you said is accurate.
I shall test it.
I think you got it right for the move 1, then everything else just alternates regardless of initiave for move 2, move 3, move 4.
This post was last edited by lex***@yahoo.com at 2016-10-20 19:30

I don't think you guys understood my point.

In short, is it possible for you to attack with 2 ninja one after the other ?
Check my example very carefully, you have Low init, then High init.
Move order 1 low init, Move order 2 high init.
So , you have 2 attacks one after the other ? Is that possible ?
1. You attack - I attack
2. I attack - You attack
3. You attack - I attack
4. I attack - you attack

Is this theoretically possible ? That's what you are implying.
This post was last edited by lex***@yahoo.com at 2016-10-24 15:48

Then this means there is potentially an entirely different set of strategies revolving around initiative,
If you can follow 2 normals one after the other, imagine the posibilities ! You could chain healers, or poisoners or igniters....
But the drawback lies in mystery order, as one who is obsessed with "First Draw", I always ensure max refines in moves 1 and 2.

Thanks for the info.