Khar*ways has great logic. Progression is wrong, giving up is right. Sounds like one hell of an achiever. His *ogy is also defeatist and insulting as that is his mentality. I would actually compare people who love the game and fight for it's progress while constantly failing to any successful person who actually knows that to succeed they had to fail more times than most people can suffer. Just because he is the first to come to mind take Lincoln for example. Lincoln’s failures were broad and numerous. He achieved the unique feat of leaving for a war a captain and returning a private (the lowest military rank). He next took failure in his stride during multiple failed business attempts. Undeterred, Lincoln marched into the political realm, where he launched several failed runs at political office before his ascendance to President which ultimately led to abolishment of slavery. As Kharan is likely to misunderstand that the story as my comparison between abolishing slavery and trying to improve a browser game I have to note that the example I took is about success and great changes coming through unrelenting will in spite of failure. You can just as easily take any known examples of success in spite of failure that affected the world like Einstein, Edison or Disney.

On the contrary. There is no flaw in the *ogy, just your understanding of the same. Lincoln was not an ordinary citizen because he decided not to be. You are taking a simple *ogy about people conquering all obstacles simply become they didn't give up. You instead take a literal example of Lincoln and his life as something that must be followed to the point in order to achieve change in an mmo game. To put it in words you can understand, you don't need to become a CEO. You just need not to give up and do what you can.

Big fishes and bans. You are unraveling and starting to babble. If you gave up on making a change in the game there is no need for you to feel so strongly about shutting down people that would like to enjoy a better environment for no reason. If you invested a fraction of effort you put into trying to shut down any attempt at a positive change you would likely already see a positive change in the game already regardless of you spending or not spending on the game. Why don't you take your own advice? You are whining constantly over players advocating for a better state of things. Your whining over players peacefully protesting against many easily removed flaws of the game is just as "inconsequential in the grand scheme of things". What is bothersome is that unless someone is paying you to do so, you're finding a very strange hobby for yourself that will give no positive effect, while complaints from the ever increasing unsatisfied players might.

At the end you once again took things literally. Generalizing about "all" inventors and generally successful people having backers and support. Even though I am amazed by your literal interpretation of my *ogy even though I specifically noted that you would likely take it that way, that's also something I can address. Those inventors had their backers and players complaining about the game have more players complaining about the same. If an *ogy you would be more suitable to understand would be that of great peaceful protests, go with that.