This same thread of mine that was in General Discussion section of the forum got deleted there because I was informed it should have been created in Bugs & Support section of the same so I here it is again. Hopefully you aren't disheartened enough to stop fighting for the cause xD.
Dear Naruto Online Community and Oasis staff,
as I am writing this on 17.03.2020 most s1400+ servers are entering cross-server function after close to 3 months without it and have suffered inactivity that was present on the server for months already, hoping the delay for not having cross-server events after day 60 was because we were part of a new cluster. Yet, surprisingly we have been added to s994-current cluster of servers.
For those unaware s944 is, on the day I am writing this appeal and question to Oasis, 629 days old or 1 year, 8 months and 19 days.
And this was just a lone picture from Sage Battlefields on the opening day of the cluster - 17.03.2020.
So the questions that follow are, what is the reasoning behind having 500+ server clusters instead of 50-100 server clusters at most?
Does anyone from Oasis staff in charge of making clusters actually play this game as a f2p player or is it more likely you don't play at all?
I have a lot of acquaintances in this game that have cultivated f2p alternative accounts that are older than a year and yet 5x stronger than average power on my server. How strong are their own f2p or spender accounts I won't even get into, but nobody from my server, and I think I’m saying this on behalf of every other server that got made in the last 6 months, wants to ever see them in cross-server events.
As I write this I already know what the odds are of things ever changing for the better, but I am looking forward to see a lot of answers from like-minded players, if not Oasis, about how we can change things for the better? Would 1000 players complaining on the forum and to customer support daily change things? Can we even get organized? Is there some other idea you have that could change things for the better?
I would also like to make something clear. I would personally be totally
fine with my server (s1424) being the last server in a hundred server
cluster, like with s1324 - s1424. Just so I'm clear this is not just a
complaint for personal better position in the game.
To anyone who reached the end of this post, it already means I didn't write it all in vain. I thank you! <3
Ps, this thread is not here to incite rage. I am
just one of many players that feel this way and wanted to discuss how
to change it for the better and maybe receive some answers. I know it is a subject often discussed
here and it got no results, but I for one am willing to keep trying
to make a game we love change for the better indefinitely. If any
part of this thread is offensive or seen as inciting rage, I am
politely asking the moderators to inform me which parts need to be
censured/edited out or again put in another place instead of deleting it with no prior warning.
Thank you.
Saying "the most illogical thing about the game" is like saying "the smelliest piece of po0p" or "the shiniest gold coin". Some may be worse than others, but the game's still full of them.
So very true. I didn't have much imagination when writing in the name of the topic. If I could change it right now I would.
May we actually request to be removed from cross-server? Just let us play and die in peace. We'll be much more content dying slowly until a merge instead of having a 2 year old cluster. That shouldn't be impossible so the question is if dear Oasis allows it and listens to their players. And if all in 1400+ agree, just merge us all eventually without cross. Happy as pigs in mud.
Hello dear community.
I don't know about you, but I want you to know I haven't given up on asking for answers and fighting the the good fight. I've been mighty busy, but still my list of questions has only grown bigger. I am not sure how many of you have noticed and I don't know how true this statement is, but level 70+ Sage is the first available Sage World Battlefield in the game nowadays.
What I am backing this claim with is meeting lvl40 people in this game and many lvl60's in a lvl70 Sage.
Now, here's the thing. I have been playing this game about a year ago on UK's s1085 and distinctly remember there existing Sage Battlefields below level 70, and I'm sure mostly everyone in the game is aware of this and I'm not spilling any new knowledge. I am even aware there were Sage Battlefields going as low as lvl40 because we had a player that just came here and now to play Sage and was still in his lvl40's, when the rest of us were at in lvl60 or lvl70 range. It happened back in the day that a lvl60-69 person would be placed in a lvl70 Sage because one of lvl70 Sage Battlefields wouldn't have enough players to be created on it's own, or at least not the desired amount programmed into the game. However, such cases were rare and mostly affected lvl60 players from top of the level range starting with lvl69 and going lower if more players are needed to satisfy Sage conditions.
So if there existed level 40 and level 60 Sage Battlefields back in the s994 - s1100 approximately, how are there none in s994 - s1450?
Coming from a basis that my claim here is true, my only guess is that Oasis decided to deal with level freezers by removing every Sage Battlefield below level 70+. However what they failed to account for is that in a cluster as huge as this, that is the worst decision in this companies long history of bad decisions, as level freezing is the number one reason f2p veterans have to play this p2w notorious game. This is resulting in f2p and low spending players ending up not only with a horrible ratio of wins and loses, but in winning so seldomly that such occasions are to be celebrated like a New Years Eve.
So this is just another plea to Oasis to answer maybe only a lone players concerns about whether there are Sage Battlefields lower than level 70, if not why and will they ever return? I have faith you haven't forsaken your playerba
Thank you.
Log in in order to Post. LOGIN | Register