I honestly expect them to give you a temp ban from the forums due to name calling and just being a * off. People expressing their concerns about a change in an event that has always remained a consistent way in the past is valid, regardless of what you agree with or not. SOMETIMES it helps and they listen, sometimes it doesn't. Lately Oasis has seem to at least pay attention more so now than before. Criticism is good, but people like you seem to think that criticizing those with valid points or complaints is better.

Personally, Shisui and AGKonan are in the same category: Situational ninjas that are no longer meta and there are better options out there.......IF AND ONLY IF you have been playing for years. New players would love these ninjas. A better option? They could have given half of Konan, Half of another good ninja. Instead, they reduced it by half.....probably to see if they can keep doing that. You know, testing the waters.

It is the same pattern as before: 3v3? I remember getting 100 frags of Chiriku, 100 frags of Edo Hanzo. Then MORE Chiriku to where everyone could almost 5 star him. Then slowly, they started giving other "event" ninjas...but at 80 frags....so if you missed a day, you were SOL. THEN they started giving 70......now it looks like it will be 65 or 60 even. See the pattern? Do you call these ninjas "GAME BREAKING" or value them like Shisui? Naw mate, you don't.

That isn't the only example: Great plates was FRIGGIN AWESOME when it first came back and for 3 times straight....then suddenly, it started getting more and more lack luster....until this last one where it was almost good again.

So please, spare the insults....when events start appearing to get nerfed because they seem too good, people .... the players that this company depend on have a right to express it without people like you.

inb4 attacks