I'm sorry, who's hating here?

I don't mind this being behind a paywall tbh, mainly because Idontcare will never ever get them anyways.

Alrighty boyo. I get what you're saying. Daiske may be a lot of things, but he doesn't exactly deserve all of the unrestrained hate. If people wanna complain they might as well do it logically.

Now I might be neutral on the Hana issue, but transparency is a no no. I'm going to have to dispute you on that one, boyo.

First of all. What's made you defend Daiske so much. I'm curious to see what he's done that has won him your favor. What kind of godly thing did he do for you to worship him and make him "yo boi", eh?

Secondly, the statement of "how can you say he lacks transparency when all he does is reply with logical statements that nobody wants to accept" really fires me up. Let's look at some of his statements.

There was, nor is, any need to fix this event. There is no error or problem that would require our attention or emergency maintenance. It was planned to release this clothing in recharge event.

While we understand it may be a bit disappointing to some players, it does not mean it is completely unavailable to free to play players. For its release week, this specific clothing is limited only to recharge (paying players) event but it doesn't mean it cannot appear in redeemable event in the future. We will take your feedback of this change into consideration for future releases.

What I, as a player, value in transparency is reasoning. I don't mind decisions that don't benefit me or make me mad – as long as they have a logical reasoning that I can understand and get behind.

There's just an explanation here. No "why". This isn't transparency. If there was transparency, people would've been calmed down.

As I stated before, just because it is in recharge event does not mean it can't appear in other events as redeemable item in the future.

Same here. No reason why. No concrete details, you just kind of have to "hope". That doesn't distill player fears at all.

In previous Sakura event, food sacks were supposed to cost 20 coupons/ingots from the begging. Due to error in system, system did not update the new price. For now, its price (20 ingots/coupons) should stay same.

This is at least a decent reason "why", but it does not address the problem. In the previous Sakura events, it cost 10. But they decided not to change their plans and allocate for this error in the system for some reason. Why can't they just change their plans? I don't know, because Daiske didn't explain it. That's not transparency.

Not to mention, here's another thing Daiske told me a while back regarding schedule releases.

I do not play FGO but I really doubt they release their whole schedule with all details. They might announce that some new changes, features or characters are coming in next few weeks. We sadly can't do that.

Again, no reason why not. Releasing details in advance actually helps a lot in hyping stuff up, but I guess... they can't do that for some reason?

Now I get that Oasis is inclined to keep a lot of its info to itself. They won't give out everything, no poo poo, dippoo poo. But the least they can do is share just a few more details with us so we feel like they actually care. I'm going to quote Dosu and the Dosu case again here as an example to show the kind of "transparency" we have. Somebody who wasn't Dosu suggested to add Dosu as playable, and every 9 or so months Dosu starts feeling like the suggestion is being ignored and posts some big thread about why Dosu should be added into the game as a reminder to the team. His last paper was about transparency, and how they should at least give updates for their CS suggestions to show that they're actually getting somewhere. And Tobei (I think?) provided a great and detailed answer, and said "yeah we have so many requests that it'd be impossible for us to check up on each and every one of them". After a year and a half of poor transparency, Dosu finally got what I would call genuine transparency. There's an understandable reason behind it, and that's fine. Since then it's gotten a little better, as mods have started openly acknowledging Dosu's other posts. But it isn't optimal. More explanations like Tobei's would be better.

Peace out, yo.

-Doicare

Alright boyo.

I tried to be civil and nice.

But I think we're being just a little bit too toxic here. Besides, we're divulging from the point of this thread.

Why don't we take it to the PMs instead? I'll send you my response as a PM. Then we won't be spreading toxicity all over the place like we are right now, eh boyo?

Peace out.

-Doicare

The lad he deleted got rather... salty to say the least.