Reply
Views: 13491 | Replies: 22
[ Help ] You guys think my leader is right or wrong?

 [

Copy Link

]

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 22
  • Posts: 835
On 2017-12-26 01:48:20Show All Posts
18#
  • S:339 Gale fan On 2017-12-25 17:28:50
  • lets see, many points have been said already, but here is my view on this.

    Pros: With just around 30 members there are less people to give out GNW packs compared to having 80 members. You also get the chance to plunder more people since they are not in your group anymore.

    Cons: With less members it takes more time to build up the group fund. Also the with less members u get lower group activity rate, or is that calculated by something else? With less members you wont be able to fill up all the fields and if one or more of the "elite" members go inactive its harder. Also by kicking so many members you lose lots of potentials.

Having that many ACTIVE players in a group in a pretty new server (up to 2 months, during which first major batch of ppl quits) isn't really a great idea. It's better for servers health if these players are spread among 2-3 groups so they can get packs and improve their characters before merge. Real benefit of a mass group that early on is higher group lvl when merge happens. But when it's ur server alone, pack/ninja starvation does more harm than big group does good. Keep in mind if you hoard all the good players from the beginning, you kill the server's health yourself- for you no competition means no fun, for the receiving side always losing causes frustration. If new servers are also allowed to participate in cross gnw, larger group would make more sense, but still thats a pack every 3 weeks (30players) instead of every week (10).





This post was last edited by Zathroth on 2017-12-26 01:57:16.
Reply
Quicky Post
Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register