Reply
  • Go To
  • Page
Views: 10782 | Replies: 24
[ Bugs ] Only 3 Battlefields?

 [

Copy Link

]

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 12
  • Posts: 108
On 2017-08-15 01:12:46Show this Author Only
21#

In our GNW saturday our group had all 6 battlefields against our opponent group. We also have two of the lowest participating groups with ours usually having around 5-7 people and the opponent group usually only having around 3.
Meanwhile the two top groups on the server who usually can fill every battlefield with three people only had three battlefields.

If this is determined based on the number of participants, shouldn't it be the complete opposite? Fewer people fewer fields?

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 164
  • Posts: 3533
On 2017-08-15 17:09:06Show this Author Only
22#
  • PraiseLuka On 2017-08-14 17:19:58
  • Can you provide a bit more detail on that?

    First, assuming that the game cannot predict the future, I'm guessing it uses the number of participant in the previous round? So if this happens in the finals, then that means the participant count in the semi-final was low? If this is the case, does this only work within a specific GNW or does it work toward the future. For example, if the participant count is low in the final of the current war, would there be 3 fields only in the first round of the next round? Or perhaps the first round of qualifier? Does the thing share behavior between qualifier and final? That is to say if the 2nd round of qualifier sees low participants, does that mean first round of final would be only 3 fields? Or does this only apply to the non-first round of final?

    According to post #8 here: https://forum-narutoen.oasgames.com/page/show-post-23194-1.html

    It is supposed to be based on "past 3 weeks", but that seems to contradicts reports made here, specifically post #14 and #15. Thou I guess in theory, it can be said that since this is a new feature, past data was not collected, and since it was the first war since the maintenance where this was added, it only looked at the one single round. And it was using the average of past 3 weeks where every other entry was null, and thus the average changed from null to whatever # in the first round, resulting in what we saw here. So can we have some consistency as well as exactness?



    Second, by which group is it determined? Since each war have two groups and they SHOULD* fight in equal footing, so the 3 field thing would happen to both. So is it based on the higher participant group? The lower one? the average? I mean would this happen if one group have 5 while the other have 15? 20? 30?


    And Lastly, just how low does it have to be? This is, of course, related to #2. But is it when it's 15 or less on the higher/lower/average? or maybe 10? Some of the screenshots I see show as many as 15. Thou due to #1, it is possible that the bar is lower and that in the previous round, which might be easier/less important, fewer people showed and thus fell below the bar even if the bar is less than 15. Or maybe it's based on average/less of the two.



    There is a claim here: https://forum-narutoen.oasgames.com/page/show-post-23188-1.html that said that they have 3 while opponent 6. However, the screenshot below does not support this, as the enemy did not get any free pts(0 pts). It is still possible that the opponent had 6, but whatever they deployed in lower field ended up being useless. Hopefully this is just the guy not knowing what he is talking about.


    PS: I really hate it when people spawn new threads about the same topic when the previous ones aren't locked. It was quite difficult composing a proper post when there are multiple thread I need to source from.

Hello.

I can tel you this :

~ Your group needs a minimum of 27 participants in order to unlock all 6 battlefields.
~ If none of the warring groups reached 27 participants in last 3 weeks, they will have to war within the 3 top fields (10, 8 and 7).
~ It is possible to fight as group with only 3 battlefields against group with 6 battlefields. However, if small group with only 3 battlefields is fighting group with 6 battlefields, both of the groups will have 6 battlefields. As long as one of the fighting groups has met this requirement (minimum of 27 participants), both groups will have 6 battlefields.
~ Is it possible to have 6 fields on Wednesday but only 3 fields on Saturday ? The amount of battlefields is calculated according to group's last 3 week participation. So no, it is not possible, not in general situation.








This post was last edited by Daiske on 2017-08-15 17:10:02.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 92
On 2017-08-16 01:32:04Show this Author Only
23#
  • Daiske On 2017-08-15 17:09:06
  • Hello.

    I can tel you this :

    ~ Your group needs a minimum of 27 participants in order to unlock all 6 battlefields.
    ~ If none of the warring groups reached 27 participants in last 3 weeks, they will have to war within the 3 top fields (10, 8 and 7).
    ~ It is possible to fight as group with only 3 battlefields against group with 6 battlefields. However, if small group with only 3 battlefields is fighting group with 6 battlefields, both of the groups will have 6 battlefields. As long as one of the fighting groups has met this requirement (minimum of 27 participants), both groups will have 6 battlefields.
    ~ Is it possible to have 6 fields on Wednesday but only 3 fields on Saturday ? The amount of battlefields is calculated according to group's last 3 week participation. So no, it is not possible, not in general situation.





sorry to tell you, but it's the most * feature EVER. Bring back the 6 battlefield, with 3 theres no tactic

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 6
  • Posts: 174
On 2017-08-16 06:04:15Show this Author Only
24#

why tho? why do this why screw us over? and if its that way it should be so easy to get rid of and make it how it was all 3.0 has given us is buggs and lots of secret screwing and not adding any of the good things other than the few sweep features and exam but i would rather have stayed with 2.0 until they could work out all the bugs and not screw us over and tell us the changes and have all the features or at least more of the good ones all i have seen is ones that screw us over and over

Reply
  • Go To
  • Page
Quicky Post


Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register

You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
Report
Enter the Reason of the Report:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.

Confirm Delete Selected Topics?

Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.

Confirm Delete The post you selected?

Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
Ban (for this Section)

Status:

Ban Type:
Ban for a Period:
  • Hour(s)
  • Day(s)
  • Month(s)
  • Ban Permanently
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!