Reply
  • Go To
  • Page
Views: 10710 | Replies: 24
[ Bugs ] Only 3 Battlefields?

 [

Copy Link

]

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 142
  • Posts: 1532
On 2017-08-12 19:36:47Show this Author OnlyDescending Order
1# Go To

what is this


I just wonder what is this?!


  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 45
On 2017-08-12 19:47:33Show this Author Only
2#

yeah i also get this 3 BF in GNW today.

S30

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 0
  • Posts: 8
On 2017-08-12 19:52:26Show this Author Only
3#

me too, S220 and S408 only 3 field, i'm not sure is this new patch or bug


  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 45
On 2017-08-12 19:53:46Show this Author Only
4#
  • ThatGuyNoisyV2 On 2017-08-12 19:52:26
  • me too, S220 and S408 only 3 field, i'm not sure is this new patch or bug


Should be a bug since all other version is still 6 BF.


And "IF" it is an update, should we be informed before hand?





This post was last edited by luvyahui@yahoo. on 2017-08-12 20:15:45.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 6
  • Posts: 59
On 2017-08-12 20:02:06Show this Author Only
5#

Oh great we lost because of this 3 lands bug!!! WE never lose on the 1st round now this happened!!!

fix this and give compenstation

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 0
  • Posts: 11
On 2017-08-12 20:08:26Show this Author Only
6#

same here in S30...

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 14
  • Posts: 95
On 2017-08-12 20:14:07Show this Author Only
7#

can someone on the admin or maybe a moderator here that can explain about this issue or "bug" if its a bug?

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 164
  • Posts: 3533
On 2017-08-12 21:02:42Show this Author Only
8#

Hello.

We are currently investigating this change/problem with developers. At the moment, I can't confirm or deny if it is bug or not. Once we will receive response, we will let everyone know.

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 45
On 2017-08-12 21:03:43Show this Author Only
9#
  • Daiske On 2017-08-12 21:02:42
  • Hello.

    We are currently investigating this change/problem with developers. At the moment, I can't confirm or deny if it is bug or not. Once we will receive response, we will let everyone know.

Noted with thanks


  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 142
  • Posts: 1532
On 2017-08-12 21:59:13Show this Author Only
10#
  • Daiske On 2017-08-12 21:02:42
  • Hello.

    We are currently investigating this change/problem with developers. At the moment, I can't confirm or deny if it is bug or not. Once we will receive response, we will let everyone know.

Thank you for the response Daiske-san. Hopefully it IS a bug, not an intended change. It'd be unfair if this were to be permanent.

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 14
  • Posts: 273
On 2017-08-12 23:16:52Show this Author Only
11#

If it never happened in CN then it is definitely a bug

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 23
  • Posts: 302
On 2017-08-13 02:54:22Show this Author Only
12#

NarutoOnline170812213758

s480 too

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 3
  • Posts: 12
On 2017-08-13 03:08:59Show this Author Only
13#

gnwbug

520 as well.


  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 92
On 2017-08-13 03:33:07Show this Author Only
14#

same problem on s510

in semi we had no opponent and had 6 battlefield, in finals we had only 3

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 2
  • Posts: 9
On 2017-08-14 16:15:40Show this Author Only
15#

had the same problem but first round we had 6 fields and in the 2nd round and final round we had 3 fields


  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 164
  • Posts: 3533
On 2017-08-14 16:49:15Show this Author Only
16#

Hey there !


Quick update from developers. It is new update to GNW, it's not a bug. The amount of battlefields are related to the amount of participants.





This post was last edited by Daiske on 2017-08-14 16:50:25.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 29
  • Posts: 2271
On 2017-08-14 17:19:58Show this Author Only
17#
  • Daiske On 2017-08-14 16:49:15
  • Hey there !


    Quick update from developers. It is new update to GNW, it's not a bug. The amount of battlefields are related to the amount of participants.


Can you provide a bit more detail on that?

First, assuming that the game cannot predict the future, I'm guessing it uses the number of participant in the previous round? So if this happens in the finals, then that means the participant count in the semi-final was low? If this is the case, does this only work within a specific GNW or does it work toward the future. For example, if the participant count is low in the final of the current war, would there be 3 fields only in the first round of the next round? Or perhaps the first round of qualifier? Does the thing share behavior between qualifier and final? That is to say if the 2nd round of qualifier sees low participants, does that mean first round of final would be only 3 fields? Or does this only apply to the non-first round of final?

According to post #8 here: https://forum-narutoen.oasgames.com/page/show-post-23194-1.html

It is supposed to be based on "past 3 weeks", but that seems to contradicts reports made here, specifically post #14 and #15. Thou I guess in theory, it can be said that since this is a new feature, past data was not collected, and since it was the first war since the maintenance where this was added, it only looked at the one single round. And it was using the average of past 3 weeks where every other entry was null, and thus the average changed from null to whatever # in the first round, resulting in what we saw here. So can we have some consistency as well as exactness?



Second, by which group is it determined? Since each war have two groups and they SHOULD* fight in equal footing, so the 3 field thing would happen to both. So is it based on the higher participant group? The lower one? the average? I mean would this happen if one group have 5 while the other have 15? 20? 30?


And Lastly, just how low does it have to be? This is, of course, related to #2. But is it when it's 15 or less on the higher/lower/average? or maybe 10? Some of the screenshots I see show as many as 15. Thou due to #1, it is possible that the bar is lower and that in the previous round, which might be easier/less important, fewer people showed and thus fell below the bar even if the bar is less than 15. Or maybe it's based on average/less of the two.



There is a claim here: https://forum-narutoen.oasgames.com/page/show-post-23188-1.html that said that they have 3 while opponent 6. However, the screenshot below does not support this, as the enemy did not get any free pts(0 pts). It is still possible that the opponent had 6, but whatever they deployed in lower field ended up being useless. Hopefully this is just the guy not knowing what he is talking about.


PS: I really hate it when people spawn new threads about the same topic when the previous ones aren't locked. It was quite difficult composing a proper post when there are multiple thread I need to source from.




This post was last edited by PraiseLuka on 2017-08-14 17:29:42.
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 5
  • Posts: 57
On 2017-08-14 18:18:19Show this Author Only
18#

i dont get why this was never told to us or why it even happens so a group of 3+ highest bp big whales could make a group and win war it removes strategy and is a downhrade like almost all of the 3.0 we have gotten all because the things that benifit us are left out

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 0
  • Posts: 12
On 2017-08-14 23:02:36Show this Author Only
19#

What the hell u bring update without giving any info about it?! We lost GNW by group we never lost before because we didnt know what is going on because your mistake and that mean we get less seal scrolls from packs because you. You dont even admit mistake and say sorry with giving us info 2 days later pretending it was nothing


  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 18
  • Posts: 336
On 2017-08-14 23:28:07Show this Author Only
20#

They ruined the game with ridiculous rules

Reply
  • Go To
  • Page
Quicky Post


Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register

You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
Report
Enter the Reason of the Report:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.

Confirm Delete Selected Topics?

Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
You have selected 1 Topic.

Confirm Delete The post you selected?

Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!
Ban (for this Section)

Status:

Ban Type:
Ban for a Period:
  • Hour(s)
  • Day(s)
  • Month(s)
  • Ban Permanently
Reason:
undefined200undefined
Confirm
You did not select a Topic.!