I'm one, seems, of the very few that thinks cross server swb was a good idea because it actually helps the large part of the population that is free to play, that live in a server with less than 30 active people and that have no chance to be top3 (so, more or less, 70% of the whole population). But what the other 20-30% says it's partially true, in the sense that right now the problem is that the difference between first and last per battlefield is too wide. I don't know if thia was your purpose. I suppose it wasn't, looking at what you claimed, then I just suggest you to set up the cap per field at 39-42 players instead of 75. The reason of this difference in power is that you are trying to fill every field with 75 people. Are too many if the purpose is to get even matches, overall if you think that not everyone joins swb for many reasons. If you add to this the fact that if you are in the middle of the field you know also next time you'll be put together with half of the people from the previous battlefield you get the point. Lower the cap to 39 or 42 per battlefield and you'll give us what you promised. It's only the fact you want 75 people per battlefield that messes up everything.