We Need More Packs to Hand Out

5.0 GNW Treasure Minato

Forgot Your Password?

Views: 7123 ｜ Replies: 16

[ Suggestions ] We Need More Packs to Hand Out

[

Copy Link

]

PraiseLuka

Registered: 2017-07-24
Topics: 29
Posts: 2271

On 2017-02-16 08:14:46 ｜ Show All Posts

5＃

I would only support this once server merger have reached such a point such that each server have around 200 active players spread in at least 8 different groups (of average 25 each).

For as long as you HAVE the option of splitting the group for more packs easily, the premise for this suggestion is very weak.

PraiseLuka

Registered: 2017-07-24
Topics: 29
Posts: 2271

On 2017-02-16 08:52:27 ｜ Show All Posts

7＃

MM®Yusuke On 2017-02-16 08:29:59
why u not ask for change reward GNW.
there is just need change some rules for getting reward
like :
1 participate get 1 seal and 1000 group pt, 2 partcipate get 2 seal and 1000 group pt, 3 participate get 5 seal 1000 grp pt, 4 participate get 8 seal sand 1000 pt. efc with some contribution.
for the winning BP get additional, for 1 win BP who has that battle get 5 seal frag and some coins.

so, u not need to giving the packs to anyone and all will get.
i will happy too if we can get like that
as a leader group, i see low lv and high lv from my group will need that all, so hard for giving the packs for some inactive ppl or low lv or to someppl not raising power/lv. but if a leader just ignore they all, soon they will leaving thats group, so sad.;P

oh yes, let's make the less active server weaker (comparatively) to the active servers even more.

The only thing that super low activity server might have on more active server right now is more packs per person, they have fewer player per group, which means more packages per person since the package number is fixed regardless of group size.

But your suggestion reverses this.
That's right, not just remove this advantage, but reverse it. How? Because less active servers will have less groups, which means less rounds in the final (which is between 1 to 3 rounds, not entirely sure what happens when there are only one group), which means less reward per person.

granted, this suggestion would benefit me, but I'd still have to vote against it until they can get merger done PROPERLY (yeah... like that'll ever happen) so that low pop server is no longer a matter of concern. This post was last edited by 117***@google at 2017-2-16 08:53

Quicky Post