This Is the description of the event so maybe they need to change something.
http://image.prntscr.com/image/d9d148203a594d229dcb6bbf67695a6a.png

It says top 20 but in fact its top 50 .

they need to make it 2 ss and they should make it only top 20 so no one talks *.

merge servers will never accept this ..

.

The only problem I have with top 50 being able to plunder is the competitiveness of getting to SS missions first. lol

+1 , i'm rank 21 on my server so if the cancel plunder from me ppl in top 20 will be uncatachable and that will * for the 30 players on the 50 , i'm with being top 20 in unactive servers but merged servers need 50 to keep the activity and the challenging on the server

Speaking from a merged server I can say top 20 would cause the top to get even further ahead, I'm top 20 so it wouldn't make a difference to me but to those behind me it would be, the only problem we have atm is as someone else mentioned the competitiveness over the SS-ranks, it can be a real pain sitting there clicking a refresh *on for over an hour or so.
My point being top 50 is just fine as long as your server is active enough that is tho...

Thats why i said expect a few servers because servers like s1 its better to have top50 they got like 1000 active people . In merged servers wouldnt been a problem either but the problem is they are not merging US xD and a shet ton of other servers .

So instead suggest a lot more merges then screwing servers that work well to fix the broken ones.

Well;personally I don't agree. I am 21 on my server and we all that want to can do plounder without problem. Honestly, the only problem is to be faster than the others to finish in a few minutes but that's all. If people who are too low or something similar can't do plounder there is always convoy. And the server thing is just an excuse; we aren't the most active server but ploundering is not a problem.

Top 20 is bad for "large" servers

But top 50 ISNT bad for "small" servers.

Fact of the matter is, no one is FORCING you to do plunder. If your server doesn't have enough to sustain 50, then maybe people need to get smart and not all flock to plunder always. Instead, within each group, work out a schedule or rotation, so that instead of everyone plundering everyday and getting 1-2 only, now only half the people plunder each day and everyone can get 3-4.
So let's transform the prisoner's dilemma problem into a cooperative game and find that Nash equilibrium, ok? Instead of coming to the forum and suggest something like this.

On a side note, I'm top 10, ftp, never plunder, hate plunder, so as far as my interest or view goes, I should be supporting this. But objectively speaking, this is "bad".

The 2xSS bit, of course, no one will ever disagree with, since it helps plunder and convoy at the same time.

Thats basicly what i did but they said they wouldnt risk it because its better to have "problems" in 3 servers than lets say 10 .

What do you mean can do plunder without a problem ?? Your servers must be very active here u will sit for 2 hours and there literally wont be any ss running its not even about who clicks first now its about who the fak has the nerves to wait 3 hours for a ss to show up . - You cant tell ppl to do convoy because its * compared to plunder , if convoy had 2 free SS missions that'd be great there would be more ss missions for plunders and the ppl who dont have time to do plunder will do convoy because the rewards would be better than 1 plunder.

Hey

Unfortunately, That's a suggestion that would impact plenty of servers negatively.
There wouldn't be just deserts for specific servers. If a feature is implemented, we aim to make it fair across the game itself.

As for suggestions to increase the SS amount for convoy, I've written it down and am pushing it towards the team to hopefully implement in the future.